SMC's Overpromising Strategy Under Scrutiny

In a recent announcement that sent ripples through the Philippine business landscape, a consortium spearheaded by the esteemed San Miguel Holdings Corporation (SMC) purportedly clinched a monumental $3 billion government bid aimed at revitalizing the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA).

Charting New Heights: SMC's Ambitious Bid to Transform NAIA Raises Eyebrows and Expectations

Led by none other than SMC's billionaire CEO, Ramon Ang, the consortium pledged to rejuvenate the airport to meet global standards, leveraging their offer of 82.16% government share in airport revenues, trumping competitors in a three-way contest.

This Php171-billion endeavor encompasses a comprehensive overhaul, covering rehabilitation, operation, and maintenance of the nation's premier aviation hub.

However, amidst the celebratory fervor, concerns loom over the strategy employed by SMC, characterized by industry insiders as "overpromising."

Overpromising entails making commitments or pledges, such as offering inflated revenue shares, which may exceed the company's actual capabilities or financial constraints.

This practice, akin to low-balling, poses a myriad of risks including project delays, compromised quality, and financial instability for the company.

Critics argue that SMC's lofty promises regarding revenue sharing could potentially strain its financial resources, raising doubts about its ability to deliver on these commitments.

As stakeholders raise questions about the feasibility of SMC's financial capabilities, the concept of the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) emerges as a pivotal metric for evaluating the project's viability.

IRR, a cornerstone of financial analysis, is a way to measure the profitability of an investment or project. It's basically the rate at which an investment breaks even, meaning the money you put into it equals the money you get out of it.

Essentially, it's the rate at which your investment grows over time, taking into account the timing and amount of cash flows. A higher IRR indicates a more profitable investment.

While there's no universal IRR threshold, companies typically align this metric with their strategic objectives and shareholder expectations.

However, the challenge lies in striking a balance between maximizing returns and managing risks effectively.

In the realm of MBA programs, students are groomed to dissect IRR within the context of specific investment opportunities, considering a variety of factors, including the type of infrastructure, the level of risk associated with the project, prevailing market conditions, and the specific objectives of the company or investors involved.

The ideal IRR, as taught in these programs, must surpass the company's cost of capital, which serves as a benchmark for investors' minimum required return.

Therefore, the question stands, does SMC's bid meet this minimum benchmark for its investors?

As SMC embarks on this ambitious tender, stakeholders remain cautiously optimistic, aware of the delicate balance between aspirations for profitability and the imperative of prudent financial management.

The NAIA revival bid stands as a litmus test for SMC's prowess in navigating the intricate terrain of infrastructure development while upholding its fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders and the Filipino people alike.

WEEKLY FEATURE : Jose Mari Chan And The Christmas Anthem